March 16, 2012 at 2:50 pm 3 comments

(Somehow there is a good pun lurking there, but at the tail end of a bout with the flu, I’m not finding it…)

Anyway, this plot says it all:

TOF for neutrinos relative to light

TOF of neutrinos compared to the TOF for light

I’ve taken this image from a new paper posted by the ICARUS Collaboration (arXiv:1203.3433).

The ICARUS experiment sees the same neutrino beam that OPERA sees, and it is located in the same Gran Sasso underground laboratory. Their experimental technique is based on an ultra-pure liquid Argon chamber that produces exquisite images of neutrino interactions, such as this one:


charged-current interaction from the ICARUS experiment

The neutrino enters from the right and interacts after traveling a few cm into the liquid Argon volume. An energetic muon is produced that flies forward to the left and exits the volume; other charged particles coming from the collision with an Argon nucleus move slower and are visible as stubby tracks coming from a common vertex. There is no doubt that this is a good neutrino interaction, and its position in the detector is very clear.

The timing capabilities of the ICARUS detector sound very impressive. The photomultiplier tubes can collect the earliest signals from the interaction and establish the time with precision in the ns range, including the inevitable systematic uncertainties coming from channel-to-channel variations, etc. Given the precision of the timing and the position measurement, the time of the neutrino arrival at, say, the wall 11 m in front of the detector can be established to better than 10 ns.

Recall that the OPERA anomaly corresponds to 60 ns.

The challenge is in making an absolute TOF measurement. The issues and challenge are essentially the same as for OPERA, and indeed ICARUS based the absolute time reference on the system set up by OPERA. They conducted a distance measurement again based on GPS that is accurate at the cm level. Although there is no independent, non-GPS cross check of the absolute time stamp, one presumes that the accuracy is as stated: much better than 10 ns. And in any case, if there were a systematic problem with the absolute time standard, it should be the same for ICARUS and OPERA (well, at least in some cases…).

CERN provided a special neutrino beam last fall in which the neutrino bunches were 3 ns wide rather than 10 us. Concerns about the treatment of pulse shapes, variations in horn currents and efficiencies across a 10 us pulse, possible technical failures of the equipment that record the pulse shapes all are swept away. The much narrower pulse leads to a much cleaner statistical analysis; the 3 ns spread is essentially negligible for the purposes of testing a 60 ns offset. This beam is ideal and indeed OPERA already reported some results earlier on.

ICARUS recorded 7 events consistent with the known neutrino flux. Three of these have interaction points inside the Argon (the event picture above is one of these three), and the other four have interaction points inside the rock upstream of the detector; muons produced in the interaction passed through the Argon allowing an accurate time measurement. The three contained events have δTOF values of 0, -5 and +3 ns. As seen in the plot above, the set of seven events is nicely centered on zero with absolutely no indication of a 60 ns offset. The ICARUS Collaboration quantify their result as δTOF = 0.3 ± 4.0 ± 9.0 ns.

This measurement, if correct, completely refutes the OPERA result. I expect the community will scrutinize the ICARUS measurement, which is reported in far less detail than the OPERA one. Given the doubts associated with cable connections in the OPERA detector, however, it is nearly impossible to believe that neutrinos indeed travel faster than the speed of light…


Entry filed under: Particle Physics.

ATLAS has better fluctuations… The Flame Challenge

3 Comments Add your own

  • […] obeying the speed limit, as expected. This pretty much refutes the OPERA result completely. See here for details. Like this:LikeBe the first to like this […]

  • 2. Steven Dinowitz  |  March 24, 2012 at 10:01 pm

    “Anyway, this plot says it all:”

    Yes, except the energies of the 7 detected neutrino events…they are nowhere to be found in that ICARUS paper. Could it make a difference? Maybe, maybe not. Regardless, it is somewhat surprising that it is not even mentioned.

  • 3. Michael Schmitt  |  March 25, 2012 at 1:40 pm

    Yes you are right. The ICARUS paper is not nearly as complete as the OPERA one, which is unfortunate. I am hoping that this latest publication is just a “rapid communication” and that a full paper with all details will be forthcoming.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

March 2012
« Dec   Jun »

%d bloggers like this: