More commentary on judging experiments by their surprise discovery level

January 5, 2008 at 9:20 am Leave a comment

No, the additional commentary is not from me – it is quite good! 😉 If you find this topic interesting, then you should read the post Scientific Bang for the Buck, by Tommaso Dorigo, and comments to that post. Also, there is an intriguing discussion on the Deep Thoughts and Silliness blog, called “A physicist stumbles into a statistical field.”

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Particle Physics.

Good resolutions for a blogger DOE cuts: bad P.R. ?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


January 2008
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Dec »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

%d bloggers like this: